Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Two methods for calibrating discrete choice contingent valuation responses – the dichotomous choice with followup certainty question method of Champ et al. (1997) and the multiple bounded method of Welsh and Poe (1998) – are evaluated using data from a field validity comparison of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921184
Two methods for calibrating discrete choice contingent valuation responses—the dichotomous choice with follow-up certainty question method of and the multiple-bounded method of —are evaluated using data from a field validity comparison of hypothetical and actual participation decisions in a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005562254
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002505665
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001765709
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006651022
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007644767
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005293704
To date, much of the policy and research debate on contingent valuation mode effects has relied on experiences drawn from other research disciplines. This study provides the first contingent valuation phone-mail comparison that meets current standards for response rates, draws from a general...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005513834
This study provides the first contingent valuation phone-mail comparison that meets current standards for response rates, draws from a general population, is relevant to the valuation of general environmental goods, and allows comparisons with actual participation rates. Social desirability...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005078458
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001709463