Showing 1 - 5 of 5
Users alleged that, under SFAS No. 14, many large and complex firms 'under-reported' their segments. A primary reason offered to justify this behavior was managers' desire to avoid competitive harm that supposedly would arise from disclosing sensitive segment profits to competitors, customers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012743438
The AICPA SEC Practice Section notification rule requires a member firm to notify its former client and the Chief Accountant of the SEC in writing within five business days of the date it determines the client-auditor relationship has ended. The rule is unique because it was developed and is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012743776
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012743855
Our study assesses whether SFAS No. 131 improved disclosure about the diversity of multiple segment firms' operations. We find a post-SFAS No. 131 increase in cross-segment variability of segment profits, an increase in the association between reported and inherent cross-segment variability, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012784410
This study investigates the effect of firms' adoption of SFAS No. 131 segment disclosure rules on the stock market's ability to predict the firms' earnings, as captured by the forward earnings response coefficient (FERC). The FERC is the association between current-year returns and next-year...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012784955