Showing 1 - 8 of 8
We consider two (symmetric) upstream firms producing independent goods that sell to consumers through symmetric retailers. The distinguishing feature of retailers is that they have a selling capacity, in the sense, that there is an upper limit in the total units of the two goods they can sell....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008602630
The US Merger Guidelines consider that the anticompetitive effect of a horizontal merger is increasing in the initial market concentration and decreasing in the elasticity of demand. These ideas are studied in a setting where identical firms compete à la Cournot and marginal cost is constant....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008542860
It is well known that the profitability of horizontal mergers with quantity competition is scarce. However, in an … asymmetric Stackelberg market we obtain that some mergers are profitable. Our main result is that mergers among followers become …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005515890
mergers reduce the wasteful duplication of R&D expenditures. However, merger policy should become more strict in (very …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005515939
Using only information on the degree of concavity of demand and observable structural variables as the market share of firms, a necessary and sufficient condition for a merger to increase welfare is derived. On the profitability side, we obtain that when market size decreases merger...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005212610
Salant et al. (1983) showed in a Cournot setting that horizontal mergers are unprofitable because outsiders react by … increasing their output. We show that this negative effect may be compensated by the positive effect that horizontal mergers have …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005731353
A monopolist retailer facing two suppliers producing two symmetric and independent goods improves its bargaining position by commiting to sell only one good. We analyze if this advantage extends to the case where there are two undierentiated retailers competing in the same market. With linear...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005731374
In a setting where symmetric firms compete a la Cournot and costs are linear, the degree of concavity is identified as the main determinant of merger profitability. This allows to generalize the results in Salant et al (1983) and Cheung (1992).
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005731382