Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003806005
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003519878
In this paper we test the well-known hypothesis of Obstfeld and Rogoff (2000) that trade costs are the key to explaining the so-called Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Using a gravity framework in an intertemporal context, we provide strong support for the hypothesis and we reconcile our results with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003144697
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003189123
In this paper we test the well-known hypothesis of Obstfeld and Rogoff (2000) that trade costs are the key to explaining the so-called Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Using a gravity framework in an intertemporal context, we provide strong support for the hypothesis and we reconcile our results with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003120614
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003388742
In this paper we test the well-known hypothesis of Obstfeld and Rogoff (2000) that trade costs are the key to explaining the so-called Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Using a gravity framework in an intertemporal context, we provide strong support for the hypothesis and we reconcile our results with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013318280
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013424637
In this paper, we reexamine the long-standing and puzzling correlation between national saving and investment in industrial countries. We apply an econometric methodology that allows us to separate idiosyncratic correlation at the country level from correlation at the global level. In a major...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012562374
In this paper we test the well-known hypothesis of Obstfeld and Rogoff (2000) that trade costs are the key to explaining the so-called Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Using a gravity framework in an intertemporal context, we provide strong support for the hypothesis and we reconcile our results with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261322