Showing 1 - 10 of 41
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010504679
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011746931
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009732832
The pricing of Big 4 industry leadership is examined for a sample of U.K. publicly-listed companies, and adds to the evidence from the Australian and U.S. audit markets that city-specific industry leadership commands a fee premium. There is a significant fee premium for city-specific industry...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014051967
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003897724
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010247582
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009238021
We use hand-collected audit partner data to show that approximately one-third of clients are audited by partners located more than 100 kilometers away from the clients' corporate headquarters. We explore the role that partner location plays in audits by first modeling how it affects the matching...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012853705
UK listed firms are used to investigate if auditor attributes (fixed effects for audit firms, audit offices, and audit partners) add incrementally to baseline models with client controls in explaining audit outcomes (earnings quality and going concern reports). We document that accounting firm...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012826036
Francis and Yu (2009) and Choi, Kim, Kim, and Zang (2010) report evidence that Big 4 audits are of higher quality when the engagement office is of larger size: specifically, client earnings quality is higher and auditors in larger offices are more likely to issue going concern audit reports. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013101524