Showing 1 - 10 of 43
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010247582
Audit regulators around the world have expressed concern over market dominance by Big 4 accounting firms and the potential adverse effect it may have on the quality of audited financial statements. We use cross-country variation in the audit market structure of 42 countries to examine two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091958
Audit regulators around the world have expressed concern over market dominance by Big 4 accounting firms and the potential adverse effect it may have on the quality of audited financial statements. We use cross-country variation in the audit market structure of 42 countries to examine two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013092247
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009732832
Prior research emphasizes the centrality of audit offices in understanding auditing practices, and documents significant inter-office variation in audit outcomes based on industry expertise and office size. Our study examines how two city-specific labor characteristics also affect audit offices...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012968147
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003897724
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010504679
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009238021
Francis and Yu (2009) and Choi, Kim, Kim, and Zang (2010) report evidence that Big 4 audits are of higher quality when the engagement office is of larger size: specifically, client earnings quality is higher and auditors in larger offices are more likely to issue going concern audit reports. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013101524
Francis and Yu (2009) and Choi, Kim, Kim, and Zang (2010) report evidence that Big 4 audits are of higher quality when the engagement office is of larger size: specifically, client earnings quality is higher and auditors in larger offices are more likely to issue going concern audit reports. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013065507