Showing 1 - 10 of 131
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009626406
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010379458
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001794322
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001889620
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001652615
This paper discusses the implications of learning theory for the analysis of Bayesian games. One goal is to illuminate the issues that arise when modeling situations where players are learning about the distribution of Nature's move as well as learning about the opponents' strategies. A second...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014126917
The most widely used economic models of social preferences are specified only for certain outcomes. There are two obvious methods of extending them to lotteries. If we do so by expected utility theory, so that the independence axiom is satisfied, our results imply that the resulting preferences...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013068458
We show that the probability that Bayesian posteriors assign to the outcome distributions that do not ``best fit'' the empirical distribution in terms of Kullback-Leibler divergence converges to zero at a uniform and exponential rate, even when the prior does not have full support. This extends...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013235501
We show that Bayesian posteriors concentrate on the outcome distributions that approximately minimize the Kullback–Leibler divergence from the empirical distribution, uniformly over sample paths, even when the prior does not have full support. This generalizes Diaconis and Freedman's (1990)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014440089
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011431543