Showing 1 - 10 of 92
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010376810
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009154806
Conventional wisdom holds that voters punish governments that implement fiscal austerity. Yet, most empirical studies, which rely on ex-post yearly austerity measures, do not find supportive evidence. This paper revisits the issue using action-based, real-time, ex-ante measures of fiscal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012613677
This paper revisits the conventional but unproven wisdom that voters penalize governments for adopting fiscal austerity in a sample of advanced economies. We consider the composition of the austerity package and the economic manifesto of the implementing government and find that austerity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014482952
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011509544
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012874050
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013329659
This paper examines the distributional effects of fiscal consolidation. Using episodes of fiscal consolidation for a sample of 17 OECD countries over the period 1978–2009, we find that fiscal consolidation has typically had significant distributional effects by raising inequality, decreasing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010790370
This paper analyses the effects in terms of size and volatility of government revenue and spending on growth in OECD and EU countries. The results of the paper suggest that both variables are detrimental to growth. In particular, looking more closely at the effect of each component of government...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011604895
This paper provides empirical evidence showing that smaller countries tend to have more volatile government spending for a sample of 160 countries from 1960 to 2000. We argue that the larger size of a country decreases the volatility of government spending because it acts as an insurance against...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011604970