Showing 1 - 6 of 6
by allowing participants to condition their choices in an asymmetric prisoner's dilemma and a trust game (i) on their …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005867074
In the Yes/No game, like in the ultimatum game, proposer and respondercan share a monetary reward. In both games the proposer suggests a rewarddistribution which the responder can accept or reject (yielding 0-payoffs). Thegames only differ in that the responder does (not) learn the suggested...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866695
Fairness is a strong concern as shown by dictator and ultimatum experiments. Efficiency, measured by the sum of individual payoffs, is a potentially competing concern in games such as the prisoners' dilemma. In our experiment participants can increase efficiency by gift giving. In the one-sided...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005867006
Similar to welfare economics where with(out) interpersonal comparisonsone defines unique (set-valued) welfare (Pareto) optima, we present a frameworkfor one-person decision making where with(out) a prior probability distributionindividual optimality prescribes usually a unique (set of)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866454
In this note we establish that rational demand expectations willtypically not evolve in an evolutionary model. In an evolutionarymodel beliefs act like a commitment device to more aggressive be-havior. This commitment effect has the same direction for strategicsubstitutes and complements and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866911
Evolutionary game theory is often used to analyze the evolution of moral preferences. A few studies also examine the co-evolution of preferences and an institutional aspect of the environment. Allowing the adaption of just one institutional aspect such as litigation or legal insurance to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005867095