Showing 1 - 10 of 496
We study experimentally how taxpayers choose between two tax regimes to fund a public good. The first-best tax regime imposes a general, distortion-free income tax. However, this tax cannot be enforced. The second-best alternative supplements the income tax by a specific commodity tax. This tax...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013318974
We study experimentally how taxpayers choose between two taxregimes to fund a public good. The first-best tax regime imposes ageneral, distortion-free income tax. However, this tax cannot be enforced.The second-best alternative supplements the income tax by a specificcommodity tax. This tax...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866846
We study experimentally how taxpayers choose between two tax regimes to fund a public good. The first-best tax regime imposes a general, distortion-free income tax. However, this tax cannot be enforced. The second-best alternative supplements the income tax by a specific commodity tax. This tax...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011450920
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001596937
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001597176
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001617032
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011296500
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001983646
Many consumption prices are highly volatile. It would certainly overburden our cognitive system to fully adjust to all these changes. Households therefore often rely on simple heuristics when deciding what to consume, e.g. in the form of a constant budget share for a specific consumption...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009612561
Can one define and test the hypothesis of (un)bounded rationality in stochastic choice tasks without endorsing Bayesianism? Similar to the state specificity of assets, we rely on state-specific goal formation. In a given choice task, the list of state-specific goal levels is optimal if one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263798