Showing 1 - 10 of 12
This paper examines why unsolicited ratings tend to be lower than solicited ratings. Both self-selection among issuers and strategic conservatism of rating agencies may be reasonable explanations. Analyses of default incidences of non-U.S. borrowers between January 1996 and December 2006 show...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003904071
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003429774
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003989549
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003674892
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003707695
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009010624
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003630789
We provide insights into determinants of the rating level of 371 issuers which defaulted in the years 1999 to 2003, and into the leader-follower relationship between Moody's and S&P. The evidence for the rating level suggests that Moody's assigns lower ratings than S&P for all observed periods...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002844152
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001813471
their subsequent default history up to the end of 2002. Viewing bond ratings as predicted probabilities of default, we show …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010306287