Showing 1 - 10 of 27
We produce a comprehensive decomposition of syndicated loan risk into credit, market and liquidity risk and test how these shape loan syndicate structure. Banks dominate relative to onbank investors in loan syndicates that expose lenders to liquidity risk. This dominance is most pronounced when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012725206
Liquidity risk in banking has been attributed to transactions deposits and their potential to spark runs or panics. We show instead that transactions deposits help banks hedge liquidity risk from unused loan commitments. Bank stock-return volatility increases with unused commitments, but the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012780123
Liquidity risk in banking has been attributed to transactions deposits and their potential to spark runs or panics. We show instead that transactions deposits help banks hedge liquidity risk from unused loan commitments. Bank stock-return volatility increases with unused commitments, but only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012757780
We offer a new explanation of loan syndicate structure based on banks' comparative advantage in managing systematic liquidity risk. When a syndicated loan to a rated borrower has systematic liquidity risk, the fraction of passive participant lenders that are banks is about 8% higher than for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012759529
We report evidence from the equity market that unused loan commitments expose banks to systematic liquidity risk, especially during crises such as the one observed in the fall of 1998. We also find, however, that banks with higher levels of transactions deposits had lower risk during the 1998...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012762543
This paper argues that banks have a unique ability to hedge against market-wide liquidity shocks. Deposit inflows provide funding for loan demand shocks that follow declines in market liquidity. Consequently, one dimension of bank specialness' is that banks can insure firms against systematic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012762778
Unused loan commitments expose banks to systematic liquidity risk, but this exposure can be reduced by combining loan commitments with transactions deposits. We show that bank equity volatility increases with unused loan commitments, but this increase is reduced for banks with high levels of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012709880
This paper argues that banks have a unique ability to hedge against market-wide liquidity shocks. Deposit inflows provide a natural hedge for loan demand shocks that follow declines in market liquidity. Consequently, one dimension of bank quot;specialnessquot; is that banks can insure firms...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012740146
Liquidity risk in banking has been attributed to transactions deposits and their potential to spark runs or panics. We show instead that transactions deposits help banks hedge liquidity risk from unused loan commitments. Bank stock-return volatility increases with unused commitments, but the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012466434
We report evidence from the equity market that unused loan commitments expose banks to systematic liquidity risk, especially during crises such as the one observed in the fall of 1998. We also find, however, that banks with higher levels of transactions deposits had lower risk during the 1998...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012467706