Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Asymptotic tests for fractional integration are usually badly sized in small samples, even for normally distributed processes. Furthermore, tests that are well-sized under normality may be severely distorted by non-normalities and ARCH errors. This paper demonstrates how the bootstrap can be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005423891
Asymptotic tests for fractional integration are usually badly sized in small samples, even for normally distributed processes. Furthermore, tests that are well-sized under normality may be severely distorted by non-normalities and ARCH errors. This paper demonstrates how the bootstrap can be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005190915
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001714017
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000971372
This paper investigates how fractional cointegration affects the common maximum likelihood cointegration procedure. It is shown that the likelihood ratio test of no cointegration has considerable power against fractional alternatives. In contrast to the case of a cointegrated system, the usual...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005190901
Asymptotic tests for fractional integration, such as the Geweke-Porter-Hudak test, the modified rescaled range test and Lagrange multiplier type tests, exhibit size-distortions in small-samples. This paper investigates a parametric bootstrap testing procedure, for size-correction, by means of a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005649149
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001543449
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000978987
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000984101
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000968575