Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001520704
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002735579
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003337068
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003020812
The 1964 Securities Acts Amendments extended the mandatory disclosure requirements that had applied to listed firms since 1934 to large firms traded Over-the-Counter (OTC). We find several pieces of evidence indicating that investors valued these disclosure requirements, two of which are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005829550
The 1964 Securities Acts Amendments extended the mandatory disclosure requirements that had applied to listed firms since 1934 to large firms traded Over-the-Counter (OTC). We find several pieces of evidence indicating that investors valued these disclosure requirements, two of which are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005553465
The 1964 Securities Acts Amendments extended the mandatory disclosure requirements that had applied to listed firms since 1934 to large firms traded Over-the-Counter (OTC). We find several pieces of evidence indicating that investors valued these disclosure requirements, two of which are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005737808
The recent emphasis on sector-specific investment strategies has led to the emergence of industry-specific calendar anomalies, notably the technology sector "summer swoon." A standard ttest implies that these price movements provide arbitrage opportunities. However, this test fails to account...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005701195
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007632412
The 1964 Securities Acts Amendments extended the mandatory disclosure requirements that had applied to listed firms since 1934 to large firms traded Over-the-Counter (OTC). We find several pieces of evidence indicating that investors valued these disclosure requirements, two of which are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012736133