Showing 1 - 10 of 15
One paradox of voting states that, in a general election, in which many citizens vote, the probability that a single voter can affect the outcome is so small that in general citizens have no rational reason for voting. However, if all citizens accept this reasoning, then none will vote, and so...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010863883
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005364721
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005147250
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005155757
Controversy persists over the link between turnout and the likelihood of success of Democratic candidates (e.g., DeNardo, 1980, 1986; Zimmer, 1985; Tucker and Vedlitz, 1986; Piven and Cloward, 1988; Texeira, 1992; Radcliff, 1994, 1995; Erikson, 1995). The authors argue that the participants in this debate have largely...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005705687
The authors extend the standard Downsian framework to suppose that voters consider the identity of each candidate's supporters when deciding whom to support, rather than considering only the announced policy positions of the candidates. In particular, they posit the existence of a class of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005809509
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001404699
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001255610
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012127425
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003686665