Showing 1 - 10 of 127
This paper examines whether, in addition to standard unit root and cointegration tests, panel approaches also produce test statistics behaving erratically when applied to tests for PPP. We show that if appropriate tests (which are robust to cross-sectional dependence and more powerful than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010296758
We analyse whether tests of PPP exhibit erratic behaviour (as previously reported by Caporale et al., 2003) even when (possibly unwarranted) homogeneity and proportionality restrictions are not imposed, and trivariate cointegration (stage-three) tests between the nominal exchange rate, domestic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263988
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003822534
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003377315
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003391534
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003391548
We analyse whether tests of PPP exhibit erratic behaviour (as previously reported by Caporale et al., 2003) even when (possibly unwarranted) homogeneity and proportionality restrictions are not imposed, and trivariate cointegration (stage-three) tests between the nominal exchange rate, domestic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003381611
This paper examines whether, in addition to standard unit root and cointegration tests, panel approaches also produce test statistics behaving erratically when applied to tests for PPP. We show that if appropriate tests (which are robust to cross-sectional dependence and more powerful than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394591
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008653316
This paper examines whether, in addition to standard unit root and cointegration tests, panel approaches also produce test statistics behaving erratically when applied to tests for PPP. We show that if appropriate tests (which are robust to cross-sectional dependence and more powerful than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009216930