Showing 1 - 10 of 11
When evaluating the significance of calendar effects, such as those associated with Monday and January, it is necessary to control for all possible calendar effects to avoid spurious results. The downside of having to control for a large number of possible calendar effects is that it diminish...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010318856
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001752590
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001752607
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001732977
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001831943
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001860213
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002583522
This paper applies the model confidence sets (MCS) procedure to a set of volatility models. A MSC is analogous to a confidence interval of parameter in the sense that the former contains the best forecasting model with a certain probability. The key to the MCS is that it acknowledges the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014048659
Out-of-sample tests of forecast performance depend on how a given data set is split into estimation and evaluation periods, yet no guidance exists on how to choose the split point. Empirical forecast evaluation results can therefore be difficult to interpret, particularly when several values of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010851187
This paper applies the Model Confidence Set (MCS) procedure of Hansen, Lunde, and Nason (2003) to a set of volatility models. A MCS is analogous to confidence interval of a parameter in the sense that the former contains the best forecasting model with a certain probability. The key to the MCS...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010318935