Showing 1 - 10 of 32
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003646981
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003971745
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009382060
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010429308
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010461331
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001727409
There are two main tax-related arguments regarding the use of reinsurance – the income volatility reduction and the income level enhancement arguments. The income volatility reduction argument contends that firms facing convex tax schedules have incentives to hedge in order to reduce the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009428585
Two alternate lines of argument - the tax incentive and disincentive argument - exist to explain the reinsurance decision of insurance company managers. The former argues that insurance managers purchase reinsurance in order to reduce annual reported profits and lower tax liabilities, whereas...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012786497
This study tests whether the organic growth rates of United Kingdom (UK) life insurance firms are independent of size, as predicted by Gibrat's (1931) Law of Proportionate Effects. Using data for 1987–1996 and the three subperiods, 1987–1990, 1990–1993, and 1993–1996, we find that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009429758
There are two main tax-related arguments regarding the use of reinsurance – the income volatility reduction and the income level enhancement arguments. The income volatility reduction argument contends that firms facing convex tax schedules have incentives to hedge in order to reduce the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009429759