Narrow search
Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Cover Image
Implications of a GATT Agreement for World Commodity Markets, 1991-2000. Scenario A: Modern Support Reductions of 50-33-33 with Expenditure Disciplines on Export Subsidies
Hayes, Dermot; Hennessy, David A.; Buhr, Brian L.; … - Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), … - 1991
A dynamic multicountry, multicommodity model is used to evaluate the impact of a moderate General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) agreement. The terms of this agreement are as follows. 1) Export subsidy quantities (using annual and price wedges) are reduced by 50 percent from the 1986-88...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005786330
Cover Image
Determining Winners and Losers from a GATT Agreement: The Importance of Base Periods and Rules
Hayes, Dermot; Hennessy, David A.; Buhr, Brian L.; … - Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute … - 1991
To identify the winners and the losers from the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in agriculture, it is necessary to know which countries will be required to reduce which subsidies by what amounts. Rules that seem fair may actually impose very different future obligations on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008564439
Cover Image
Implications of a GATT Agreement for World Commodity Markets, 1991-2000. Scenario A: Modern Support Reductions of 50-33-33 with Expenditure Disciplines on Export Subsidies
Hayes, Dermot; Hennessy, David A.; Buhr, Brian L.; … - Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute … - 1991
A dynamic multicountry, multicommodity model is used to evaluate the impact of a moderate General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) agreement. The terms of this agreement are as follows. 1) Export subsidy quantities (using annual and price wedges) are reduced by 50 percent from the 1986-88...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008564445
Cover Image
Determining Winners and Losers from a Gatt Agreement: The Importance of Base Periods and Rules
Buhr, Brian L.; Hansen, James; Hassan, Zuhair A.; … - Department of Economics, Iowa State University - 1991
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008543869
Cover Image
Implications of a Gatt Agreement for World Commodity Markets, 1991-2000. Scenario A: Moderate Support Reductions of 50-33-33 with Expenditure Disciplines on Export Subsidies
Buhr, Brian L.; Hansen, James; Hassan, Zuhair A.; … - Department of Economics, Iowa State University - 1991
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008543876
Cover Image
Implications of a Gatt Agreement for World Commodity Markets, 1991-2000. Scenario B: Moderate Support Reductions of 50-33-33 with Quantity Disciplines on Export Subsidies
Buhr, Brian L.; Hansen, James; Hassan, Zuhair A.; … - Department of Economics, Iowa State University - 1992
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008508473
Cover Image
Analysis of the Ec Commission Plan for Cap Reform
Westhoff, Patrick; Hayes, Dermot J.; Meyers, William H.; … - Department of Economics, Iowa State University - 1991
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008508489
Cover Image
Determining Winners and Losers from a GATT Agreement: The Importance of Base Periods and Rules
Hayes, Dermot; Hennessy, David A.; Buhr, Brian L.; … - Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), … - 1991
To identify the winners and the losers from the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in agriculture, it is necessary to know which countries will be required to reduce which subsidies by what amounts. Rules that seem fair may actually impose very different future obligations on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005612566