Showing 1 - 6 of 6
The empirical economic growth literature is criticized for its lack ofrobustness. For different definitions of robustness, conclusions vary from 'almost everycorrelation is fragile' to 'a substantial number of explanatory variables are robust.' Were-analyze the empirical results of the economic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011326970
The empirical economic growth literature is criticized for its lack ofrobustness. For different definitions of robustness, conclusions vary from 'almost everycorrelation is fragile' to 'a substantial number of explanatory variables are robust.' Were-analyze the empirical results of the economic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011255799
The empirical economic growth literature is criticized for its lack ofrobustness. For different definitions of robustness, conclusions vary from 'almost everycorrelation is fragile' to 'a substantial number of explanatory variables are robust.' Were-analyze the empirical results of the economic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010324921
The empirical economic growth literature is criticized for its lack of robustness. For different definitions of robustness, conclusions vary from 'almost every correlation is fragile' to 'a substantial number of explanatory variables are robust.' We re-analyze the empirical results of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005137163
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001663831
The empirical economic growth literature is criticized for its lack of robustness. For different definitions of robustness, conclusions vary from "almost every correlation is fragile" to "a substantial number of explanatory variables are robust." We re-analyze the empirical results of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014117833