Showing 1 - 10 of 94
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011667019
This paper reconsiders the predominant typology pioneered by Baumol (1990) among productive, unproductive and destructive entrepreneurship. It is shown that the foundation of Baumol’s classificatory scheme is the restrictive concept of first-best outcomes, and therefore it easily fails to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003756992
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003325162
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003325163
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003352461
Public policy is currently shifting from SME policy towards entrepreneurship policy, which supports entrepreneurship without directing attention to quantitative goals and specific firms or employment groups. The institutional framework set by public policy affects the prevalence and performance...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003867872
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003506133
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003987630
Entrepreneurship is largely ignored or treated in a highly simplified way in endogenous growth theory. Still, it is now widely recognized that the supply of entrepreneurial talent is likely to be important for economic growth, innovation and job creation. In this study we provide an in-depth...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009492616
Evasive entrepreneurs innovate by circumventing or disrupting existing formal institutional frameworks by evading them. Since such evasions rarely go unnoticed, they usually lead to responses from lawmakers and regulators. We introduce a conceptual model to illustrate and map the interdependence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011420647