Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012819866
This article presents the first experiment exploring the impact of debarments - the exclusion of colluding bidders - on collusion in procurement auctions. We find that debarments and their most common alternative, fines, reduce collusion and bids relative to a market with no sanction. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012852366
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012162501
This paper explores the impact of debarment as a deterrent of collusion in first-price procurement auctions. We develop a procurement auction model where bidders can form bidding rings, and derive the bidding and collusive behavior under no sanction, debarment and fines. The model's predictions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011822812
assumptions in matching theory, I show that the Boston mechanism improves perceived fairness. These results underscore the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012861362
Public school choice often yields student placements that are neither fair nor efficient. Kesten (2010) proposed an efficiency-adjusted deferred acceptance algorithm (EADAM) that allows students to consent to waive priorities that have no effect on their assignment. In this article, we provide...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012815570
Public school choice often yields student placements that are neither fair nor efficient. Kesten (2010) proposed an efficiency-adjusted deferred acceptance algorithm (EADAM) that allows students to consent to waive priorities that have no effect on their assignment. In this article, we provide...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013302776
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015046385