Showing 1 - 10 of 36
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003451455
Over the past decade, researchers have expressed concerns over what seemed to be a paucity of replications. In line with this, editorial policies of some leading marketing journals have been modified to encourage more replications. We conducted an extension of a 1994 study see whether these...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012714129
Over the past decade, researchers have expressed concerns over what seemed to be a paucity of replications. In line with this, editorial policies of some leading marketing journals have been modified to encourage more replications. We conducted an extension of a 1994 study see whether these...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014050363
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005465897
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007270418
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002989431
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002989450
This paper is about how the author proposes to replicate Evanschitzky, Baumgarth, Hubbard, and Armstrong's "Replication research's disturbing trend" (Journal of Business Research, 2007). This is because estimating the incidence of published replication research and its outcomes must be continued.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011725212
The Neyman-Pearson theory of hypothesis testing, with the Type I error rate, alpha;, as the significance level, is widely regarded as statistical testing orthodoxy. Fisher's model of significance testing, where the evidential p value denotes the level of significance, nevertheless dominates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012714126
Replication is rare in marketing. Of 1,120 papers sampled from three major marketing journals, none were replications. Only 1.8% of the papers were extensions, and they consumed 1.1% of the journal space. On average, these extensions appeared seven years after the original study. The publication...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012756566