Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009554307
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009554315
Lin and Chang (2009, 2010) establish a VIX futures and option pricing theory when modeling S&P 500 index by using a stochastic volatility process with asset return and volatility jumps. In this note, we prove that Lin and Chang's formula is not an exact solution of their pricing equation. More...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009554553
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011446602
Lin and Chang (2009, 2010) establish a VIX futures and option pricing theory when modeling S&P 500 index by using a stochastic volatility process with asset return and volatility jumps. In this note, we prove that Lin and Chang's formula is not an exact solution of their pricing equation. More...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010577448
The classical version of the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing requires that zero-sets of the real-world probability measure P are known. We chose a different route and start from a possibly non-dominated set of probability measures P representing uncertainty about the zero-sets of the real...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013032239
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009840987
[16] and [17] establish a VIX futures and option pricing theory when modeling S&P 500 index by using a stochastic volatility process with asset return and volatility jumps. In this note, we prove that Lin and Chang's formula is not an exact solution of their pricing equation. More generally, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013099972
It is common in the financial mathematics literature to start by fixing a probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal F,\mathbb P)$, on which the underlying price process is defined. We depart from this route in that we do not fix the prior $\mathbb P$. Under very general assumptions, we recover the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013082678