Showing 1 - 10 of 22
We analyze the efficiency defense in merger control. First, we show that the relationship between exogenous efficiency gains and social welfare can be non-monotone. Second, we consider both endogenous mergers and endogenous efficiencies and find that merger proposals are largely aligned with a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009572245
We analyze horizontal mergers when the acquirer holds a passive partial ownership stake (PPO) in the target firm prior to the merger. We show that a PPO reduces the minimal synergy level necessary to make a merger beneficial for consumers. It follows that an antitrust authority ignoring existing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009788178
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010504784
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002121711
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003294058
We challenge the view that the presence of powerful buyers stifles suppliers ́incentives to innovate. Following Katz (1987), we model buyer power as buyers ́ability to substitute away from a given supplier and isolate several effects that support the opposite view, namely that the presence of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003217211
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002485144
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001759946
This paper argues that it cannot be taken for granted that any merger that raises consumer surplus also increases social welfare. We assume a Cournot model with homogeneous goods, linear demand, and constant marginal costs, to show that a merger can raise consumer surplus while harming social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012628987
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013287614