Showing 1 - 8 of 8
We develop a new but simple non-parametric method to diagnose inconsistency in double-bounded contingent valuation questions in the presence of both perfect and imperfect correlation between initial and follow-up response distributions. The proposed method can identify inconsistency in iterative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010678888
Replaced with revised version of paper 02/02/11.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008922698
A nationwide survey was conducted to estimate welfare associated with a proposed large-scale wetland restoration project in coastal Louisiana. Both binary- and multinomial-choice survey instruments were administered via Knowledge Networks, with the latter used to estimate willingness to pay for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011069915
Arrow et al. (1993), the “Blue Ribbon” panel that issued guidelines for contingent valuation, recommended that respondents to contingent valuation surveys be explicitly allowed to give ‘no-answer’ responses such as ‘don’t know / not sure / prefer not to vote (PNV)’ in addition to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011069916
In traditional contingent valuation, the researcher seeks the amount a respondent is willing, ceteris paribus, to pay to obtain something. But if a respondent receives a “warm glow†from a yes response, ceteris is not paribus. In estimating willingness to pay (WTP) to reduce...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010911099
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011740944
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011938684
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010396189