Showing 1 - 7 of 7
How does the public provision of education and the deployment of distortionary tax and subsidy instruments differ when the government's objective is conventional welfarist compared to when the objective is the non-welfarist one of equality of opportunity? This paper develops a framework in which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011986968
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012033189
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011576721
This paper develops a Mirrlees (1971) framework with heterogeneous agents to analyze optimal redistributive taxes, optimal provision of public goods and the marginal cost of public funds (MCF). Standard MCF measures are shown to suffer from three defects: i) The MCF for the (non-individualized)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008732260
This paper extends the Mirrlees (1971) model of optimal income redistribution with optimal corrective taxes to internalize consumption externalities. It is demonstrated that the optimal second-best tax on an externality-generating good should not be corrected for the marginal cost of public...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009010179
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010413633
A common claim in the policy discourse is that a government wishing to achieve equality of opportunity should use public provision of education for equalisation of opportunities rather than income taxation, which only equalizes incomes. We develop a framework in which the tax and education...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012291870