Showing 1 - 10 of 20
We examine potential selective reporting in the literature on the social cost of carbon (SCC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 809 estimates of the SCC reported in 101 studies. Our results indicate that estimates for which the 95% confidence interval includes zero are less likely to be reported...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010429931
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011306058
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011342390
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011564893
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011379952
One of the most frequently examined statistical relationships in energy economics has been the price elasticity of gasoline demand. We conduct a quantitative survey of the estimates of elasticity reported for various countries around the world. Our meta-analysis indicates that the literature...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008908934
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009313667
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009616291
We examine potential selective reporting in the literature on the social cost of carbon (SCC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 809 estimates of the SCC reported in 101 studies. Our results indicate that estimates for which the 95% confidence interval includes zero are less likely to be reported...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013025396
We examine potential selective reporting (publication bias) in the literature on the social cost of carbon (SCC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 809 estimates of the SCC reported in 101 studies. Our results indicate that estimates for which the 95% confidence interval includes zero are less...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013018028