Showing 1 - 10 of 20
We extend the model of Fullerton, Karney, and Baylis (2012) to explore cost-effectiveness of unilateral climate policy in the presence of leakage. We ignore the welfare gain from reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and focus on the welfare cost of the emissions tax or permit scheme. Whereas that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010659427
In our analytical general equilibrium model where two polluting inputs can be substitutes or complements in production, we study the effects of a tax on one pollutant in two cases: one where both pollutants face taxes and the second where the other pollutant is subject to a permit policy. In...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010821699
Our analytical general equilibrium model solves for effects of a small increase in carbon tax on leakage—the increase in emissions elsewhere. Identical consumers buy two goods using income from endowments that are mobile between sectors. Usually an increase in one sector’s tax raises output...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010780592
We extend the model of Fullerton, Karney, and Baylis (2012 working paper) to explore cost-effectiveness of unilateral climate policy in the presence of leakage. We ignore the welfare gain from reducing greenhouse gas emissions and focus on the welfare cost of the emissions tax or permit scheme....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010785641
Policymakers and economists have considered a number of different policies to reduce carbon emissions, including a carbon tax, a cap-and-trade permit system, a subsidy for the purchase or use of low-carbon vehicle technology, a renewable fuel standard, and mandates on manufacturers to increase...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010291171
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012013192
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010394628
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009504264
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009767370
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009733372