Showing 1 - 10 of 14
2011) using the Contingent valuation (CV) as well as the Inferred valuation (IV) method (Lusk and Norwood 2009b). We find that when moving in the context of a familiar market for consumers (i.e., the food market) we only observe weak effects of inconsistencies. In addition, we find that the IV...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009326456
This article contributes to the research agenda of accommodating psychological insights in conventional lab experiments. We specifically test whether inducing subjects into different mood states has a significant effect on subjects’ rationality (in the form of preference reversals) and on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011137854
In this paper, we employ a method to examine the factors affecting quality choice by Greek households, using cross-sectional survey data. We illustrate the method using the raw data of the 2004/05 Household Budget Survey for meat and fish products. Quality elasticities of total food expenditure...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010588226
We examine inconsistencies in preference orderings using the Contingent valuation (CV) and the Inferred valuation (IV) methods. We find that in the context of a food market we do not observe strong inconsistencies. Weak inconsistencies are observed for the IV method, indicating that IV is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010638306
We comment on a recent important article by Akbay et al. and discuss some methodological and estimation issues arising from their paper. We then suggest alternative procedures that may help improve their estimates and thereby enhance their usefulness as a basis for food policy and marketing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005569782
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011704084
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011900879
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009734024
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009673613
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003712944