Showing 1 - 10 of 79
In recent years, companies have begun to voluntarily disclose alternative measures of CEO compensation. These figures differ — sometimes significantly — from those reported in the summary compensation tables of the annual proxy. The motivation to report this information, however, is not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011862295
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003961425
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009552245
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009552246
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009784188
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003991806
We estimate classification models of deceptive discussions during quarterly earnings conference calls. Using data on subsequent financial restatements (and a set of criteria to identify especially serious accounting problems), we label each call as “truthful” or “deceptive”. Our models...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013094980
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001354073
Understanding CEO compensation plans is a continuing challenge for directors and investors. The disclosure of these plans is dictated by SEC rules that rely heavily on the “fair value” of awards at the time they are granted. The problem with these numbers is that they are static and do not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011870307
The litmus test for an effective compensation program is whether it provides “pay for performance.” While the concept of pay for performance is simple, its implementation is not. In particular, boards must consider not only whether a compensation plan encourages executives to pursue...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011864729