Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003744014
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003395414
Various authors, most notably Putnam (2000), have argued that low-density living reduces social capital and thus social interaction, and this argument has been used to buttress criticisms of urban sprawl. If low densities in fact reduce social interaction, then an externality arises, validating...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010271843
Various authors, most notably Putnam (2000), have argued that low-density living reduces social capital and thus social interaction, and this argument has been used to buttress criticisms of urban sprawl. If low densities in fact reduce social interaction, then an externality arises, validating...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004970909
Various authors, most notably Putnam (2000), have argued that low-density living reduces social capital and thus social interaction, and this argument has been used to buttress criticisms of urban sprawl. If low densities in fact reduce social interaction, then an externality arises, validating...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005416499
Various authors, most notably Putnam [Putnam, R.D., 2000. Bowling Alone. Simon and Schuster, New York], have argued that low-density living reduces social capital and thus social interaction, and this argument has been used to buttress criticisms of urban sprawl. If low densities in fact reduce...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005216908
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008062207
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008850691