Showing 1 - 10 of 16
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000754890
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000769999
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009304814
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003459743
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003417569
In a canonical takeover model we let an informed large shareholder choose between making a bid or initiating a sale to another acquirer. Such takeover activism complements direct takeovers because the very choice mitigates the asymmetric information problem, thereby improving efficiency. As more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014470819
This paper documents for a sample of 327 US acquisitions between 1975 and 1987 three forces that systematically reduce the announcement day return of bidding firms. The returns to bidding shareholders are lower when their firm diversifies, when it buys a rapidly growing target , and when the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012476048
We examine performance and management characteristics of Fortune 500 firms experiencing one of three types of control change: internally precipitated management turnover, hostile takeover, and friendly takeover. We find that firms experiencing internally precipitated management turnover perform...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012476534
We examine performance and management characteristics of Fortune 500 firms experiencing one of three types of control change: internally precipitated management turnover, hostile takeover, and friendly takeover. We find that firms experiencing internally precipitated management turnover perform...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012754746
We compare activism and takeovers from a blockholder's perspective who can invest effort into improving firm value. Profits from the two intervention modes move in opposite directions when the marginal return to effort changes such that activism, although less efficient, can be more profitable....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012856282