experiment with 743 subjects whether small-scale, seemingly negligible, events also affect the formation of risk preferences. In … line with a reinforcement learning model, we find that subjects who won a random lottery took significantly more risk in a … second lottery almost a year later. The same pattern emerges in another experiment with 136 subjects where the second lottery …

experiment with 743 subjects whether small-scale, seemingly negligible, events also affect the formation of risk preferences. In … line with a reinforcement learning model, we find that subjects who won a random lottery took significantly more risk in a … second lottery almost a year later. The same pattern emerges in another experiment with 136 subjects where the second lottery …

experiment with 743 subjects whether small-scale, seemingly negligible, events also affect the formation of risk preferences. In … line with a reinforcement learning model, we find that subjects who won a random lottery took significantly more risk in a … second lottery almost a year later. The same pattern emerges in another experiment with 136 subjects where the second lottery …

experiment with 743 subjects whether small-scale, seemingly negligible, events also affect the formation of risk preferences. In … line with a reinforcement learning model, we find that subjects who won a random lottery took significantly more risk in a … second lottery almost a year later. The same pattern emerges in another experiment with 136 subjects where the second lottery …

than Italian-speaking children to delay gratification in an intertemporal choice experiment. The difference remains …

, because the economics literature on group decision making has, so far, assumed homogeneity within groups. In a lab experiment …

, because the economics literature on group decision making has, so far, assumed homogeneity within groups. In a lab experiment …

than Italian-speaking children to delay gratification in an intertemporal choice experiment. This result is robust when …