experiment with 743 subjects whether small-scale, seemingly negligible, events also affect the formation of risk preferences. In … line with a reinforcement learning model, we find that subjects who won a random lottery took significantly more risk in a … second lottery almost a year later. The same pattern emerges in another experiment with 136 subjects where the second lottery …

experiment with 743 subjects whether small-scale, seemingly negligible, events also affect the formation of risk preferences. In … line with a reinforcement learning model, we find that subjects who won a random lottery took significantly more risk in a … second lottery almost a year later. The same pattern emerges in another experiment with 136 subjects where the second lottery …

experiment with 743 subjects whether small-scale, seemingly negligible, events also affect the formation of risk preferences. In … line with a reinforcement learning model, we find that subjects who won a random lottery took significantly more risk in a … second lottery almost a year later. The same pattern emerges in another experiment with 136 subjects where the second lottery …

experiment with 743 subjects whether small-scale, seemingly negligible, events also affect the formation of risk preferences. In … line with a reinforcement learning model, we find that subjects who won a random lottery took significantly more risk in a … second lottery almost a year later. The same pattern emerges in another experiment with 136 subjects where the second lottery …

experiment with 743 subjects whether small-scale, seemingly negligible, events also affect the formation of risk preferences. In … line with a reinforcement learning model, we find that subjects who won a random lottery took significantly more risk in a … second lottery almost a year later. The same pattern emerges in another experiment with 136 subjects where the second lottery …

experiment with 743 subjects whether small-scale, seemingly negligible, events also affect the formation of risk preferences. In … line with a reinforcement learning model, we find that subjects who won a random lottery took significantly more risk in a … second lottery almost a year later. The same pattern emerges in another experiment with 136 subjects where the second lottery …

Patience and risk-taking – two cultural traits that steer intertemporal decision-making – are fundamental to human … combine PISA tests with the Global Preference Survey. We find that opposing effects of patience (positive) and risk …

Patience and risk-taking – two cultural traits that steer intertemporal decision-making – are fundamental to human … combine PISA tests with the Global Preference Survey. We find that opposing effects of patience (positive) and risk …

Patience and risk-taking - two cultural traits that steer intertemporal decision-making - are fundamental to human … combine PISA tests with the Global Preference Survey. We find that opposing effects of patience (positive) and risk …

Patience and risk-taking – two cultural traits that steer intertemporal decision-making – are fundamental to human … combine PISA tests with the Global Preference Survey. We find that opposing effects of patience (positive) and risk …