Showing 1 - 10 of 44
We enrich the choice task of responders in ultimatum games by allowing them to independently decide whether to collect what is offered to them and whether to destroy what the proposer demanded. Such a multidimensional response format intends to cast further light on the motives guiding responder...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010395127
We report on an experiment designed to explore whether a written expression of disapproval affects future levels of …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010405218
In a public goods experiment, subjects can vary over a period of stochastic length two contribution levels: one is …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012721096
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011514841
We present an experiment designed to test the Modigliani-Miller theorem. Applying a general equilibrium approach and … (control) individual decision-making experiment, eliciting several points on individual demand and supply curves for shares …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009642920
We enrich the choice task of responders in ultimatum games by allow- ing them to independently decide whether to collect what is offered to them and whether to destroy what the proposer demanded. Such a multidimensional response format intends to cast further light on the motives guiding...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010887074
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009626484
group play. The validity of the measures is tested in an experiment. We find that roughly 20% of the plays exhibit dynamics …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009752437
In this paper, we study a voluntary contribution mechanism withone-way communication. The relevance of one person’s words is assessedby assigning exogeniously the role of the ‘communicator’ to onegroup member. Contrary to the view that the mutual exchange ofpromises is necessary for the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009022164
In the hybrid game, one proposer confronts two responders with veto power: one responder can condition his decisions on his own offer but the other cannot. We vary what the informed responder knows about the offers as well as the uninformed responderś conflict payoff. Neither variation affects...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010355834