Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Firms covered by more analysts are more likely to become takeover targets and more likely to enter deals in which their acquirers initiate private merger negotiations. Moreover, when equity analysts' pre-acquisition price forecasts imply greater target undervaluation, target firms are more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012839395
Many academic studies use fixed pre-announcement event days (such as -20, -42, or -63) to measure takeover premiums. In this paper, we show that the use of traditional fixed windows generates premiums that are underestimated by as much as eight percentage points. This downward bias is especially...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012899903
We connect the extensive theoretical negotiation and auction literature to real-world practice using a rich, hand-collected data set offering a comprehensive picture of high-stake merger and acquisition (M&A) negotiations for 322 deals that aggregate more than $2.4 trillion in deal value. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014343687
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013482216
Using unique, hand-gathered data, this paper examines how public news about the target firmreleased publicly during the private merger negotiation process affects bidding strategies. Weprovide strong evidence that market reactions to information events during the private sale processhave a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013224166
Using unique data, this paper examines investment banks’ choice of peers in comparable companies analysis in mergers and acquisitions. We find strong evidence that product market space is amongst the most important factors in peer selection, but we provide evidence indicating that Standard...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013233346
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012505707