Showing 1 - 4 of 4
Nash equilibrium presumes that players have expected utility preferences, and therefore the beliefs of each player are represented by a probability measure. Motivated by Ellsberg-type behavior, which contradicts the probabilistic representation of beliefs, we generalize Nash equilibrium in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005558014
Machina (2007) formulates a number of experiments, and shows that they can be used to test the Choquet expected utility model. We show that one of them can also be used to test the class of maxmin expected utility preferences in Klibanoff (2001). Those preferences are not Choquet expected...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005357413
This paper studies strategic games in which the beliefs of each player are represented by a set of probability measures satisfying a parametric specialization that is called epsilon-contamination. That is, beliefs are represented by a set of probability measures, where every measure in the set...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005357415
We generalize permissibility (Brandenburger, 1992) to allow for any suitably defined model of preference and definition of possibility. We also prove that the generalized solution concept characterizes rationality, caution, and “common belief" of rationality and caution.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005078440