Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011691192
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003906300
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008667550
This paper demonstrates the potential problem in using existing economics journal rankings to evaluate the research productivity of scholars by constructing a new ranking of economics journals and articles. Based on 2142 econometrics sample articles published from 2000 to 2005, our ranking...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008632849
The issue of whether the new one-sided procedures for testing inequalities dominate the classical procedure in terms of power remains unresolved in the literature. The Monte Carlo results in this study suggest a theoretical approach that could provide an analytical resolution
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012998087
This paper demonstrates the potential problem in using existing economics journal rankings to evaluate the research productivity of scholars by constructing a new ranking of economics journals and articles. Based on 2142 econometrics sample articles published from 2000 to 2005, our ranking...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012998098
Overall journal rankings, which are generated with sample articles in different research fields, are commonly used to measure the research productivity of academic economists. In this article, we investigate a growing concern in the profession that the use of the overall journal rankings to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012998690
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009927450