Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003681371
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002800761
This paper presents two new tools for the identification of faking interviewers in surveys. One method is based on Benford's Law, and the other exploits the empirical observation that fakers most often produce answers with less variability than could be expected from the whole survey. We focus...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002243139
This paper presents two new tools for the identification of faking interviewers in surveys. One method is based on Benford?s Law, and the other exploits the empirical observation that fakers most often produce answers with less variability than could be expected from the whole survey. We focus...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010277054
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014522658
This paper presents two new tools for the identification of faking interviewers in surveys. One method is based on Benford's Law, and the other exploits the empirical observation that fakers most often produce answers with less variability than could be expected from the whole survey. We focus...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004963678
Based on data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), this paper presents two new tools for the identification of faked interviews in surveys. One method is based on Benford's Law, and the other exploits the empirical observation that fakers most often produce answers with less variability...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005819611