Showing 1 - 10 of 16
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003906938
This paper studies sabotage in a dynamic tournament. Three players compete in two rounds. In the final round, a player who is leading in the race, but not yet beyond the reach of his competitors, gets sabotaged more heavily. As a consequence, if players are at the same position initially, they...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003908914
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009692594
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010339314
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009299740
This paper studies sabotage in a dynamic tournament. Three players compete in two rounds. In the final round, a player who is leading in the race, but not yet beyond the reach of his competitors, gets sabotaged more heavily. As a consequence, if players are at the same position initially, they...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010306984
This paper studies sabotage in a dynamic tournament. Three players compete in two rounds. In the final round, a player who is leading in the race, but not yet beyond the reach of his competitors, gets sabotaged more heavily. As a consequence, if players are at the same position initially, they...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010333728
Players often engage in high-profile public communications to demonstrate their confidence of winning before they carry out actual competitive activities. This paper investigates players' incentives to conduct such pre-contest communication. We assume that a player suffers a cost when he sends a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013119001
This paper studies sabotage in a dynamic tournament. Three players compete in two rounds. In the final round, a player who is leading in the race, but not yet beyond the reach of his competitors, gets sabotaged more heavily. As a consequence, if players are at the same position initially, they...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009367920
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008378896