Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001676890
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001748703
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001748704
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003463046
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013432562
In phase 1 of our experiment every participant plays the ultimatum game with each of the other five group members, each taking the role of proposer and responder. For each of the offers one learns how many participants would have accepted it. The pie is 30 times larger in phase 2. It thus pays...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005515330
It is often claimed that, if one could sense whether the other is going to cooperate or not, cooperators will manage to cooperate. Our experiment tries to shed new light on this debate. Participants could make their strategies in an asymmetric prisoner's dilemma game and a trust game dependent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005227229
We experimentally investigate whether individuals can reliably detect cooperators in an anonymous decision environment by allowing participants to condition their choices in an asymmetric prisoner's dilemma and a trust game (i) on their partner's donation share to a self-selected charity, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005247883
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005145710
We experimentally investigate whether individuals can reliably detect cooperators (the nice(r) people) in an anonymous decision environment involving “connected games.†Participants can condition their choices in an asymmetric prisoners’ dilemma and a trust game on past...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005711724