Showing 1 - 10 of 104
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013435956
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000899133
Statistische Daten sind im allgemeinen - gemessen an idealtypischen Erhebungsbedingungen - nicht fehlerfrei, insbesondere können sie durch die Art, wie sie erhoben werden, beeinflusst werden ("Erhebungsartefakte"). Interviewereffekte spielen in diesem Zusammenhang in der Literatur eine...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011432499
To the best of our knowledge, most of the few methodological studies which analyze the impact of faked interviews on survey results are based on "artificial fakes" generated by project students in a "laboratory environment". In contrast, panel data provide a unique opportunity to identify data...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011439529
We investigate how often replication studies are published in empirical economics and what types of journal articles are eventually replicated. We find that from 1974 to 2014 0.10% of publications in the Top 50 economics journals were replications. We take into account the results of replication...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011980966
Replication studies are considered a hallmark of good scientific practice. Yet they are treated among researchers as an ideal to be professed but not practiced. To provide incentives and favorable boundary conditions for replication practice, the main stakeholders need to be aware of what drives...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011607618
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001701478
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001882689
This paper presents two new tools for the identification of faking interviewers in surveys. One method is based on Benford's Law, and the other exploits the empirical observation that fakers most often produce answers with less variability than could be expected from the whole survey. We focus...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002243139
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001876960