Showing 1 - 9 of 9
We extend the contingent valuation (CV) method to test three differing conceptions of individuals' preferences as either: (i) a-priori well-formed or readily divined and revealed through a single dichotomous choice question (as per the NOAA CV guidelines; Arrow et al., 1993]; (ii) learned or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010319062
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003744631
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003476233
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003385983
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010506231
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011856814
We extend the contingent valuation (CV) method to test three differing conceptions of individuals' preferences as either (i) a-priori well-formed or readily divined and revealed through a single dichotomous choice question (as per the NOAA CV guidelines [K. Arrow, R. Solow, P.R. Portney, E.E....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005239560
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008850584
We examine the stability of the benefit transfer function across 42 recreational forests in the British Isles. A working definition of reliable function transfer is put forward, and a suitable statistical test is provided. The test is based on the sensitivity of the model log-likelihood to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005634951