Showing 1 - 10 of 12
We develop a procedure for removing four major specification errors from the usual formulation of binary choice models. The model that results from this procedure is different from the conventional probit and logit models. This difference arises as a direct consequence of our relaxation of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011506387
This paper contributes to the literature on the estimation of causal effects by providing an analytical formula for individual specific treatment effects and an empirical methodology that allows us to estimate these effects. We derive the formula from a general model with minimal restrictions,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011506426
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011473592
Using the net effect of all relevant regressors omitted from a model to form its error term is incorrect because the coefficients and error term of such a model are non-unique. Non-unique coefficients cannot possess consistent estimators. Uniqueness can be achieved if; instead; one uses certain...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011654066
We develop a procedure for removing four major specification errors from the usual formulation of binary choice models. The model that results from this procedure is different from the conventional probit and logit models. This difference arises as a direct consequence of our relaxation of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011755331
This paper contributes to the literature on the estimation of causal effects by providing an analytical formula for individual specific treatment effects and an empirical methodology that allows us to estimate these effects. We derive the formula from a general model with minimal restrictions,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011755335
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002443581
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002443588
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005285674
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005228757