Showing 1 - 10 of 105
This paper presents an online-experiment on overconfidence in the context of financial markets. Our subject pool consists of institutional investors, investment advisors and individual investors, all of them being registered users of a large online platform for market sentiment data. Due to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003950292
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009726207
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010351013
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008858858
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873405
This paper examines financial professionals' overconfidence in their forecasting performance. We are the first to compare individual financial professionals' self-ratings with their true forecasting performance. Data spans several years at monthly frequency. The forecasters in our sample do not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003877592
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003738750
There are robust gender differences in the domains of risk taking, overconfidence and competition behavior. However, as expertise tends to level these differences, we ask whether financial experts still show gender dissimilarities in their domains of decision making? We analyze survey responses...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003663198
This paper provides evidence on the hypothesis that many behavioral finance patterns are so deeply rooted in human behavior that they are difficult to overcome by learning. We test this on a target group which has undoubtedly very strong incentives to learn efficient behavior, i.e. fund...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003664931
The use of technical analysis by financial market professionals is not well understood. This paper thus analyzes survey evidence from 692 fund managers in five countries, the vast majority of whom rely on technical analysis. At a forecasting horizon of weeks, technical analysis is the most...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003961008