Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009732832
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009756960
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010247582
Francis and Yu (2009) and Choi, Kim, Kim, and Zang (2010) report evidence that Big 4 audits are of higher quality when the engagement office is of larger size: specifically, client earnings quality is higher and auditors in larger offices are more likely to issue going concern audit reports. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013101524
We investigate if the existence of low-quality audits in an audit office indicates the presence of a contagion effect on the quality of other (concurrent) audits conducted by the office. A low-quality audit is defined as the presence of one or more clients with overstated earnings that were...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013104821
Audit regulators around the world have expressed concern over market dominance by Big 4 accounting firms and the potential adverse effect it may have on the quality of audited financial statements. We use cross-country variation in the audit market structure of 42 countries to examine two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091958
Audit regulators around the world have expressed concern over market dominance by Big 4 accounting firms and the potential adverse effect it may have on the quality of audited financial statements. We use cross-country variation in the audit market structure of 42 countries to examine two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013092247
Francis and Yu (2009) and Choi, Kim, Kim, and Zang (2010) report evidence that Big 4 audits are of higher quality when the engagement office is of larger size: specifically, client earnings quality is higher and auditors in larger offices are more likely to issue going concern audit reports. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013065507
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010093593