Showing 1 - 10 of 13
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001060429
GRUBB’S RECENT PAPERS (2003, 2004, 2006B) ARE AIMED AT nothing less than rewriting important chapters of early American history. Our goal in both our AER and EJW comments was a negative one, to dissuade readers from accepting Grubb’s views and data. We are humbled by the complexity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008484338
Farley Grubb has developed an ambitious new money-stock time series for colonial Pennsylvania that uses the ingenious method of examining newspaper advertisements promising rewards (e.g., for help in catching runaway slaves) to estimate monies in circulation (Grubb 2004). Grubb asserts that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008484406
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005131524
Farley W. Grubb's recent papers on the early U.S. monetary system would be important contributions to the common currency area literature were not most of their historical assertions questionable and their key assumption—that the medium of exchange can be inferred from the unit of account—...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005571039
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003203265
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003203392
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006810753
In a recent article in the Economic History Review, Celia and Grubb liken colonial Maryland's dollar-denominated bills of credit to discount securities, circulating at less than their face value. This note argues that the bills in question circulated at par with specie and were treated as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012930129
In a recent NBER paper, Cutsail and Grubb argue that North Carolina's colonial bills of credit were valued like discount bonds, with a current market value largely determined by the discounted value of the bills when paid into the treasury in taxes or other public payments. Grubb has previously...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012867741