Showing 1 - 8 of 8
We consider a seller s ability to deter potential entrants by offering exclusive contracts to its downstream buyers. Rasmusen, Ramseyer, and Wiley (1991) showed that this can be a pro fitable strategy if there is a coordination failure on the part of the buyers. Segal and Whinston (2000) showed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010483054
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012610409
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012888241
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011566797
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011820582
This paper analyzes supply tariffs that discriminate between resale in different markets. In a setting with competing retailers that operate in multiple (independent or interdependent) markets, we show that, all else equal, a monopolist supplier wants to discriminate against resale in the market...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012899099
This paper examines the output effect of third-degree price discrimination in symmetrically differentiated oligopoly. We find that when the sellers' input costs are chosen endogenously by an upstream supplier with market power, as opposed to being fixed exogenously, long-standing qualitative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013241795
Weyl and Fabinger (2013) analyze the social incidence of competition and theoutput and welfare effects of third-degree price discrimination by considering thehypothetical entrance of exogenous quantity into a market. The formulas they use forthis purpose, however, are correct only for marginal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012848714