Showing 1 - 10 of 11
We provide empirical evidence on how the practice of competitive benchmarking affects chief executive officer (CEO) pay. We find that the use of benchmarking is widespread and has a significant impact on CEO compensation. One view is that benchmarking is inefficient because it can lead to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005477925
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005204123
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003812749
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003335747
We construct a large sample of both private and public firms from a broad set of industries to provide a direct comparison of efficiency, profitability, and incentive alignment. We find that operating profit scaled by sales and net profit to sales in private firms are less than half those in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012710276
We provide empirical evidence on how the practice of competitive benchmarking affects CEO pay. We find that the use of benchmarking is widespread, and has a significant impact on levels and changes in CEO compensation. The practice is controversial and one view is that it is inefficient because...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012710498
We test theories of managerial entrenchment and ability matching by examining the relation between CEO turnover and the level of firm diversification. Our results indicate that CEO turnover in diversified firms is completely insensitive to firm performance. Additional analysis indicates that for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012710546
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007259523
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008899786
We provide empirical evidence on how the practice of competitive benchmarking affects CEO pay. We find that the use of benchmarking is widespread, and has a significant impact on levels and changes in CEO compensation. The practice is controversial and one view is that it is inefficient because...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012751797